Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 4 & 5 Negligence and Careless Damage to Government Property Government employees did not follow the instructions on the transportation of cash and instead of using the vehicle and armed escort, 503 500 was sent in cash. On the way to the bank submission, a sub-employee of the public servant was stopped by unknown suspects who snatched the cash at gunpoint. The cash was required to be taken in a government vehicle and in case of non-delivery of a public vehicle, the Regional Director of Alternative Management / The officer in charge wanted to work to the satisfaction of the authority that despite the availability of an armed escort and a government vehicle, the government employee allowed his subordinates to cash in the bank, violating government directives. The inability to follow instructions as a charge of savings center by a public servant was due to the security arrangements by the department to move cash from one place to another. While the conviction was imposed, the service tribunal allowed the appeal and changed the sentence to withhold two receipts. The error in sharing the negligence of a public servant, which resulted in the loss of the discretion of the government by the service tribunal, and the punishment given by the tribunal to the civil servant was sufficient to carry out the execution of justice. Supreme Court denies interference with decision by service tribunal list of supreme court advocates from Hafizabad lawyer