Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR (POWER), WAPDA

West Pakistan WAPDA (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1978 Rr 3 (c), 4 (1) (b) (iv) and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Detection of fact-finding service from the service tribunal was found fraudulent by a Supreme Court-mandated government employee and was dismissed as a result of a departmental inquiry, as well as a result of a department inquiry. The appeal I made with the government employees, along with the appeal, was that since the co-accused was reinstated, he too, through the co-accused's service tribunal. Hali was entitled to maintenance rehabilitation, under the same charges against whom action was taken by the Department, would not provide a legitimate basis for government employees. That would be the case, and the further inquiry officer found the civil servant involved in the fraud and found him guilty and the service tribunal dismissed his appeal without exception, his service filed by the tribunal. An arrest can be made before the Supreme Court by scrutinizing the evidence for the facts and neither was there any question related to the law of public importance, in which the Supreme Court refused to appeal the intervention. Was done pakistani advocates Mehar lawyer