DR. SHAHID AMIN HYDER versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, related comments on the issue of the annual confidential report on the terms and conditions of service, the department service against the negative comments made in the annual report of the public servants. The tribunal's jurisdiction was removed. And the Service Tribunal refused to grant its jurisdiction on the ground that it was not related to the terms and conditions of service The validity of the service tribunal's validity was not correct because the negative remarks in an employee's ACR The recording was a period and its terms of service and if negative comments were recorded, the public servant has the right to be challenged initially on the grounds available to the next higher authority of the department, including Includes that negative comments were recorded for personal reasons and if the complaint is not resolved And the public servant can go to him. The tribunal was given options to resolve his complaint so that he could examine the remarks based on the material available and if the tribunal concluded that the property was not recorded in the annual secret report. Or it is based on external considerations or the allegation has not been confirmed. By content, then the tribunal was able to accept this appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer