Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Sections 1 (4) (e), 10 and Section O (1) (e) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (1) (b) Establishment of Provisional and Work Charge Regularization Rules of Irrigation Department, Chap. L, 8 1 131 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Complaint Retained Employees Employed Gardener, Watchman , Assistants, etc., worked for many years in the Irrigation Department, but their services were discontinued from working with them because such employees were provided by Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. He had reversed the decision of the Labor Labor Appellate Tribunal rejected the request because it was filed complaints about the job. The court ordered the rehabilitation of employees and the department to prove that they were hired employees, that their employment was not against a specific project or sub-project of a project, therefore, the establishment was temporary and work charge. 1 131 of the defaulted regularization rolls could not be implemented. For them, the duration of employment, the nature of the job and the absence of a particular project will fall under the purview of the permanent workers as set forth in paragraph (1) (b) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance 1968. Is. Employees can neither demand public servants nor employees receiving employment, the provisions of Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, so that employees as employees are not required to provide their grievance notice for redressal of their grievances. Or were given charge sheets and did not face any investigation, but mechanical and cruel law firms from Kamalia lawyer