Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus RESIDENT MAGISTRATE, UCH SHARIF, TEHSIL AHMADPUR EAST, DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 122 (3) Transfer of Property by West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (IV pf 1959), Sections 3, 13 A & 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Government Municipal Committee Added the respondents as the municipal committee on monthly rent to its tenants in the municipal market, later, the video resolution of the committee decided to relocate the shops in the possession of the respondents, as well as to the respondents in the shops. Under the leasehold rights of the contract their possession was canceled, under which the property in question was sold to the applicant. The Municipality and the Municipal Committee took possession of the respondents in the jurisdiction required under Section 122 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1959, and the High Court held the relation of the landlord and the tenant between the municipal committee and the respondents. Was present and the West Pak Government will issue the Ten Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, through the Sixth Supreme Court verifying the appeal of 1959, the parties approved to investigate the following disputes, which the High Court observed. The rights of the parties will be governed by the provisions. The West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 was invalid because under section 3 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, the provincial government issued a notification on October 27, 1967, so that the provisions of this Ordinance 1959 could be followed. ? Do not apply to buildings or lands belonging to the local bodies and which are used for commercial purposes; that is, under section 122 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kumbh lawyer