S.A.M. WAHIDI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Eri 212 (3) Government of Pakistan Finance Division Memorandum OM No. 4 (I) R 6/99, Dated 23 7 1999, Para 7th Employment Pension Benefits This person claimed to have retired from public employment. Subsequent claims were dismissed by the service tribunal, claiming that the employee was wrongfully deprived of the benefit of the question after his retirement from employment, on the terms of the Capital Development Authority, an independent body. Was. And the terms contained in his letter of appointment and, therefore, he will not be entitled to the benefits available to public servants for financial assistance contained in the Finance Division Memorandum OM NO F 4 (1) R 6/99, dated 23 7 1999. The request for leave to appeal and even the question of law of public importance was not included in the matter, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision passed by the leave of the service tribunal. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer