AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT versus SYED SHAKIR SHAH
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 Section 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, the establishment of administrative tribunals and courts and the jurisdiction of both the Council and Legislative Assembly of Azad Jammu and Kashmir for one or more administrative tribunals. Had the legal authority to make and establish them. And in relation to these cases, the courts whose jurisdiction was established by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Constitution Act of 1974 in the service tribunal of Azad Jammu and Kashmir in 1975 and after its establishment the jurisdiction of the common civil courts, including the High Court, was excluded in case of failure. Was done. The jurisdiction of the service tribunal in the jurisdiction of the service tribunal was explicitly mentioned in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, but the public servants were required to give their terms of service before the first day. Said outraged by an order passed in the rules. July, 1969 Appellant could not be stopped The service tribunal was not empowered to issue instructions in the jurisdiction of the service tribunal in relation to the cases of Azad Jammu and Kashmir in order to do so by law. He must do so or refrain from doing what he did not agree with. The law for making such instructions may be issued by the High Court. Any clause of the law that seeks to seize the jurisdiction of the High Court available to it under the Interim Constitution Act of 1974 must be removed by a press release from the High Court. The clauses would otherwise be in favor of the jurisdiction of the High Court Service Turbo
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Takhtbai lawyer