Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQUB versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM

The hereditary heirs passed by the Limitation Act 1908 and Article 144 Suit 5 195 1958 were challenged by the lawsuit filed on 10: 5 1974 the plaintiff obtained the suit on the basis of the gift given by the grandfather trial on his behalf. Had claimed joint occupation. The court ruled in this case, but the appellate court held that they were invalid and prevented the validity of the suit from Valdetti, so the question of joint possession would not arise. That the designation was confirmed on the 5th of 1958, after the expiry of 12 years. The plaintiffs could not aggravate the case by bringing the case of the plaintiff in possession of their former possession as co-owners, so their position was that the co-owners were to occupy a particular part of their territory. Was, no period was set, the view taken by the appellate court is not correct that the circumstances were not time bound. advocate from Kundina lawyer