Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHROITY versus KOT ADDU POWER CO. LIMITED

In view of the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties praying for the establishment of pending proceedings under the Companies Ordinance 1984 Section 290 Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, VI of 1937, Section 3 29 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 Under the ordinance of the provisions of the 5 290 Companies Act, specific steps should be taken to obtain legal action in order to resolve the dispute by interfaith shareholders or the Company of Directors of Nature of Nature, under High Court Section 290. Was able to show that the provisions need to be used. By the court itself, and by someone else, thus, the arbitrator was not able to send the petition under section 290 to the High Court dismissed the petition under section 3 of the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937, which This action was conducted under section 290. Was not responsible for withholding of the Companies Ordinance lawer from fb area from Chak Jhumra lawyer