CH. WAHEED-UD-DIN versus SYED ASAD RAZA SHAH
Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 R 18 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Facts on rejection of nomination papers Explaining the objection raised on the dispute nomination papers, objected to the nomination papers of the returning candidate that he was not ? The candidate was signed at the time of submitting the papers while he was abroad, the Returning Officer accepted the papers while the District Returning Officer withdrew the same justification. The intention of the Legislature was not to reject the nomination papers at any cost. When properly defined, any candidate should consider whether this description is true or false. This can be decided only after the recording of the evidence and the nomination papers cannot be dismissed in the summary proceedings where the facts were disputed and the recording of the evidence is necessary in this case. Fighting the election was a right of interest and no one could have come to any conclusion on account of such claims and verbal claims only on speculators and speculators, in the manner and in the present case adopted by the District Returning Officer. The rejection of the nomination papers was illegal and could not be allowed. In order to continue the order issued by the District Returning Officer and the Returning Officer, it was maintained that the objectors could file an election petition and raise their objections before the Constitutional application of the Constitutional Forum.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kalar Syedian lawyer