Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus THE STATE


Testimony of the defendants' extra-judicial admission of testimony in Section 230b (b) /, A, 4 364A and ??? Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 164 and 103 The conduct was unnatural and the evidence of such confession was even a weaker type of evidence when the prosecution had no benefit at last when it did not find credible evidence but despite the presence of many people in the area Neither witness was involved in the recovery proceedings for the apparent violation of the mandatory. Section 103, the provisions of the CRPC Motive were compiled in its supplementary statement through a complaint that was not endorsed by an independent source, it was not proved and the defendant was prosecuted in a prosecution case. Was presented for the filling which was otherwise complete. The benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and accordingly they were acquitted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Quetta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.