IMTIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access

Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment

⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000

Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

No direct evidence was available against the accused in Sections 302/34 and 460 Criminal Code (v. 1898) Articles 164 and 103 of the alleged extra-judicial confession made by the accused, not of the joint but of unnatural prosecution. Witnesses also arrested the aforementioned witnesses. The confession made significant reforms during their investigation and contradicted each other's material details. Medical evidence does not support the prosecution version. The defendants affected by the accused have been charged with violating the provisions of Section 103. Not contacted, CRPC made the recoveries were not specified The suspects were acquitted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

top advocates from Shamsabad lawyer

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

IMTIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Find a Lawyer Near You