No direct evidence was available against the accused in Sections 302/34 and 460 Criminal Code (v. 1898) Articles 164 and 103 of the alleged extra-judicial confession made by the accused, not of the joint but of unnatural prosecution. Witnesses also arrested the aforementioned witnesses. The confession made significant reforms during their investigation and contradicted each other's material details. Medical evidence does not support the prosecution version. The defendants affected by the accused have been charged with violating the provisions of Section 103. Not contacted, CRPC made the recoveries were not specified The suspects were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
