Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM HUSSAIN ALIAS RAFAQAT versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 (b) / 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 25 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 161 deprivation of confession statement, which was neither listed in the present FIR nor He was neither brought to the rape nor shown to the relevant magistrate while he was on record. While recording the confessional statement, the required questions were not put before the accused, allegations have already been withdrawn from such confessional statement. The confessional statement of independent evidence against only the accused was withdrawn, in which no verdict was made for the order of conviction unless such evidence was confirmed by some other independent evidence.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Mardan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.