MUHAMMAD RASHID KHAN versus NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Presidency Prisons Act 1993 Section 14 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Seventh Twelfth, R1 Prior to not displaying a document that was not acceptable to display the document in which it was shown that the plaintiff was a partner. Was. The suit was filed by the plaintiff with the plaintiff and the defendant was fully aware of the documents whose documents were kept on record by the plaintiff, certified copies of those documents which were not objectionable by the trial court and the appellate court. Had read in proof, could not be excluded from it. The evidence was not shown merely because the non-appearance of a document which was otherwise admissible in the evidence, was merely an irregularity and according to the evidence such a document would not be presented with the plaintiff. The High Court's observations on the admissibility of the documents presented were. The Supreme Court set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Minchanabad lawyer