Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus PROSECUTING INSPECTOR

Articles 154 and 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) were passed on a constitutional petition filed by the complainant on the direction of the High Court against the accused and after the investigation the trial court on appeal against the judgment. Challan presented in court, rejecting the High Court order, accepting the appeal against the Supreme Court decision filed before the High Court, observing that challan was already present in the trial court. What has been done, the complainant was not afraid of being negatively affected by the verdict. It was held that the facts of the case registration would be incomprehensible as the inquiry into the case never ends and in view of the fact that after the investigation, the agency had come to the conclusion that the accused was guilty of the crime with which they were involved. The person was charged. The Supreme Court, after the decision of the police, withdrawn the case from the police action against the aggravated complaint, filed a constitutional petition against the action, which the High Court rejected, saying that in view of the Supreme Court decision, The action taken by the police officer did not face any legal weakness. The question is whether the mere fact that a case was registered on the directive of the High Court given in the previous Constitution Petition, which was rejected by the Supreme Court on mere grounds, makes the investigation proceedings illegal and the matter illegal. Will justify the withdrawal, was it not admitted? The Supreme Court dismisses the constitutional petition against the action of the police authority by the High Court famous lower court advocate from Upper Dir lawyer