Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus M.A ZAFAR

Claims / 379/3799/111111 / evidence34 Testimony of evidence Moto did not in any way support the prosecution's case against the accused Medical evidence indicated that the victim was fired with a rifle and both wounds also. That was the reason. Only the lower part of the arms leg was injured and none of his vital organs were damaged, if the complainant and the witness were present with the deceased, when he was injured, they immediately rushed him to the hospital. Had died and he may not have died, the fact that the deceased was kept on the spot for sufficient tine after the incident was indicated when the shooting started, the complainant and the witness were not present on the spot. Were when the prosecutor tried to cover up the delay in reporting the case. The witnesses were witnesses to the police as well as the deceased to the hospital and did not provide any plausible explanation for their presence on the spot. He was not shown any common interest with the co-accused, who was accused of committing a crime whose culprit was not the culprit for inclusion in the commission of the crime, in these circumstances arising out of a suspected prosecution case. The suspect was taken advantage of and he got worse jobs for advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer