Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHANZENFER ALI KHAN versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, LAHORE


Search warrants by magistrates on the petition filed by the Customs Act 1969 section (as amended by Federal Laws (Amendment and Declaration) Ordinance (XXVII of 1981)) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution. Search warrants issued under 162. Under this act, members of its staff raided the store and seized goods to seize non-paid non-payment items contained in the Store Intelligence Officer (Customs), which the applicant states is a violation of the Customs Act 1969 The authority to issue warrants under 162 was not only a legal search warrant issued by the Magistrate Magistrate nor by the Mag Magistrate without any legal authority and all subsequent acts and proceedings had no legal effect. After which the High Court issued a constitutional petition directing the authorities to restore the seized goods. He accepted. Through this process of searching

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Phalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.