MUNIR AHMAD BRATTI versus THE STATE
Section 516A & 550 Contemporary Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 420/167/468/471 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application discussing motorist custody on Superdie Motor Car was not a criminal issue. Police did not register that there was no chance of suspicion of a crime in connection with the aforementioned vehicle. By seizing the vehicle under Section 505050, the CCPM suspects suspected that the motorist The property was claimed by the applicant as an FIR; subsequently registered as a witness, it was merely as a witness and not on behalf of any of the accused persons. The passenger claimed his title from the car on the basis of an open transfer letter and a certificate issued by the forensic science laboratory magistrate. If the certificate. There is no opportunity to reject the applicant's request at any time when the constitutional application of the car was not allowed and the car was handed over to the applicant at Superdie.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Raiwind lawyer
