MIAN AZIZ-UL-HAQ versus ADIL INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
Section 12 (2) A petition against an order obtained by fraud, misrepresentation or desire for jurisdiction filed under section 12 (2), CPC alleged that the defendant was in favor of the defendants and defendant. The change in the execution request filed by was confirmed through the table rate of the year 2004. , Which was much lower than the prevailing rates, the applicant, who was a contractor, alleged that the plaintiffs had been hiding financially due to concealment and misrepresentation which caused them to suffer financially. During the nomination approval, the defendant has faced court jurisdiction. Officials relied on what happened, and public scrutiny records showed that fraud and misrepresentation were made both with the responsible and in collusion with the officials. Despite efforts to re-evaluate it, the Port Acquisition Report, once released, was dispatched to about 10 10/11 different offices. Officials' statement that they could not find it was filed against the defendant against the applicant, a separate order in the court situation
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
