Sections 121212 and un 344 of the Law Testimony (of 1984 of of), Article complain 47 Transfer of a Complainant's Statement to Risk and Arrest of the Complainant for a Fresh (Current) Trial from the Last Trial and Postponement of Action Or the effect of postponement was imposed by the PowerScope Complainant, the accused (applicants) and accomplices accused of the murder of their brother, while the trial of the co-accused ended their trial, and the suspects were later arrested and He faced a trial but by then the complainant himself had fled because of his involvement in the case. Admit submitted a request to transfer the shares of a complaint to the accused persons in criminal case file. The trial court allowed the defendants' plea that they had no opportunity to examine the complainant when his statement was recorded. At the trial of the co-accused. This complainant himself was violating the law because he was absconding, and that in view of Article of47 of the 1984 Law of 1984, the complainant's statement was inconsistent and could not be used against him. Because they had no opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses. At the trial of the co-accused's Section 512, the CCP provided three instances for the protection and exchange of statements of witnesses during the defendant's plea, one of which was where the prosecution witness's attendance Delays could not be achieved without cost or inconvenience. In the present case, the complainant commits murder due to blood feuds
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
