Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR C.F.O., MARDAN versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN

Article 25 Announce dismissal of employment on complaint complaint Institution Labor Court reiterated to employees with benefits returned that the applicant did not keep any evidence on record that he was not doing any other job in the meantime. ? This shows that while away from work and dismissal, he was in employment, otherwise the applicant could not claim reimbursement with qualification and could only apply for a retrial order approved by the Labor Court. Will be entitled to receive it from the date. Appeal was partially allowed, the Labor Court decision was amended accordingly the worker was given benefits back from the date of the Labor Court decision.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• Mst. KAUSAR ZAFARULLAH v. State 2013 PCrLJ 301
• Mian AZIZ-UL-HAQ v. ADIL INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. 2013 MLD 310
• MUHAMMAD SHOAIB v. State 2013 PCrLJ 316
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD ISHFAQUE 2013 YLR 322
• ABDUL RASHEED v. ISMAIL 2013 YLR 332
• MADAD KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 333
• MALANG SHAH v. State 2013 MLD 334
• ASAL JANA v. State 2013 MLD 342

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Jampur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes