Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MST. MARZIA SULTANA

Section A 53A and Spec 54 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 suits ownership of some of the performance of the contract to sell the imperfect title of the owner while executing the sale contract in favor of the unknown The defendants who were dismissed by the trial court were dismissed for the declaration but the decision and order were dismissed by the appellate court and the case was transferred to immovable property under section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act 188 Was a contract of sale, the terms of sale between the parties of such property shall be governed by such agreement. Such property was not interested and would not have the perfect right at the same time the implementation of the agreement, the property owner's suite property. Alternatively, such an agreement executed in favor of the plaintiffs could not create any right or interest in the suit property and the plaintiffs were merely in the present case having a contract to sell the plaintiffs, having no right to sell under the contract. And even if they could get any kind of a sign they were lost with the flow of time, if there was no supporting agreement, in favor of the plaintiffs, the appellate court could legally There was no justification for issuing a declaration in favor and the decision passed by the appellate court was set aside and the case filed If he was. advocate from Mangla lawyer