Find a Lawyer

MUNIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 302/324/337A (i) 337F (V) and 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Triple 7 witnesses the murder of the triple murder evidence retrieval of testimony, but the suspects were closely related Could not prove that the witnesses had any hostility to them or that they were being dealt with illegally, the weapons recovered from the suspects were found to be tied to the recovered vacant lot and the Positives of the Franz Science Laboratory The reports supported the prosecution's case, which allegedly went abroad for the three suspects named in the FIR, especially when they were prosecuted. Fruryt was the right description. Eyewitnesses were standing in the inquiry, and in one day the incident and the prosecution, in the absence of any kind of investigation, were believed and the incident occurred. The purpose of the place in the fields was not to interfere with urban life, though it was a triple murder, but it was caused by land disputes. S. and under it was not included in the definition of terrorism under the provisions of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 and under section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the accused, under the circumstances, under section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 He was acquitted of the charge, and could not face fines at trial. There was no provision to impose fines under these provisions, there was further order of the trial court to impose fines on the accused, conviction of the accused sanctioned by the trial court under section 302/34 PPC. 'S orders were upheld, in which case the prosecution's witnesses faced an inquiry. Doctor has a secret secret Section 33A7 patent advocate from Bajaur lawyer