Find a Lawyer

RAHMATULLAH versus MUSHTAQ AHMED

Section 42 Punjab Municipal Act (III of 1911), Section 1 [which is amended by Punjab Municipal (West Pakistan (Amendment) Act (VIII of 1973)]) Rules of Service of Punjab Municipal Committees, 1969, 5, 6 and 7 The jurisdiction to retain the Declaration Civil Court, whether the employees of the municipal committee were public servants, the plaintiff claimed that he was senior to the defendant because of his previous appointment, based on the plaintiff's claim that the defendant resisted. As the plaintiff was a civil servant, the civil court had no jurisdiction. Respecting its terms and conditions of service, both the courts ruled that the employees of the municipal committee were not civil servants and the civil court had jurisdiction in this matter, which was found to be construed under the relevant local law. Was done as a body. The municipal committee that was the successor to the corporation was an independent body and was a separate and independent body, the government rate and it would not function as a government department and its employees were appointed by the plaintiff of the provincial government. The plaintiff, who was not from the local council service, could not be called a civil servant, both the courts came. As a unanimous finding of the fact that the plaintiff had joined the job at a later time than the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to claim the seniority if he did not read the false statement or evidence in any concurrent judgment and In the absence of legal instability, the following courts, reviewing it, held that the verdict was rejected: lawer from fb area from Lower Dir lawyer