Find a Lawyer

DHUMAN KHAN versus THE STATE

The value of the provisions of Sections 302/324/353 and 97 of the property came to the fore when the complainant (Lahore Development Authority officials) demolished the accused's house through a bulldozer on the basis that the accused was illegally occupied. I was doing. The prosecution had failed to prove or record a document to prove that the defendant had ever been issued a showcasing notice to vacate the property or was served by the authority which, according to the authority, had unlawful possession of it. in. The question that could not be resolved until a notice was issued to show the necessity under Sections 39 and 40 of the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975, with the mother and wife of the authorities concerned. They are requested not to demolish the house and the accused has repeatedly requested to see the documents of his title, but his request is a good and appropriate opportunity to explain his status without any confession. And the way the defendant acted, indicated that he had done so in the exercise of his right to defend the property and Under the provocative officials of the Authority was accused of plagiarism in property, including two killed and injured. He committed the killing of two people and injured the other two, no doubt he acted in favor of defending his property, but he killed two people and two other officers. Was convicted of his right to injury, but accordingly his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. law firms from Rawala Kot lawyer