Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Sale of land allotted to disputes in sections 10, 19 and 36 of the Colonization Act 1912 of the Government Land (Punjab), sold to the shopkeepers their rights and the collector made the sale under section 19 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act. Allowed The 1912 Wands, which were in their possession, acquired the status of tenants under the Government under Section 10 (4) of the Colonial Law of the Public Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, almost two years after that. The collector passed the order by which he was allowed. The demand was put aside that the permit was effective for a period of only six months and since the change in the sale transaction was not validated during that period, the colony's Part IV total (in in) client (64) The permit I filed automatically expires after a period of six months. These instructions were merely in nature and were primarily intended to guide the officers working under the Public Land Colonies (Punjab) Act, 19. 12 and did not specify a fixed term of limitation, as it is considered under the law of limitation that non-compliance with the change of six-month period cannot be removed from the individual's permission because at any time with a six-month period. Was not treated. Essentially, the change that required the clerk to act as a commissioner's representative could not use the power to call or revoke a permit, especially when it had to do so on its own. The order was not authorized to be revoked. Permission to cancel the order was also in jeopardy as the collector did not issue notice to the seller even before approving the order. advocate from Darya Khan lawyer