Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF ALIAS CHANDI versus THE STATE

Testimony of Section 302 Evidence The trial court found the motive to be remote and sufficient for the murder of the accused by the accused could not be found sufficient that no compilation was available in the account of the accused. No authentication was found. For the prosecution, it was of no use to mere evidence that the ocular evidence presented by the witnesses in the field against the accused was not only related to each other, but also to the prosecution's testimony against the accused. Were not acceptable. The murder case without any free cooperation because their statements show that they had some feeling against the accused and they had some fear because the accused's sister was abducted by the accused, in which case the trial was dismissed. Could not be done After the abduction of the sister of the two accused and the accused remained in the same village and the accused was meeting with the witnesses as well as the accused, and no objection was made to the victim's behavior nor was he molested. Had a dispute with the prosecution witnesses failed to make an appearance on the occasion, which raised serious doubts in the prosecutor's case that only the ocular account was seen, which was also the evidence of the medical evidence. That was not enough to maintain the conviction of the accused by the trial court. At night and it was difficult to understand that witnesses of the incident were witnessed by prosecutors who were 15/20 feet away. It was also suspected that the prosecution proved the accused guilty beyond suspicion, suspicion and punishment under suspension. jobs for advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer