Find a Lawyer

MST. FARZANA MAI versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 (5) and 498 Offenses Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Petitioner / Complainant applied for his cancellation of pre-arrest warrant of Section 10/11 Was acknowledged marking empty documents. The nails could not be included in the blank documents at various locations as it was a hidden form in which the bride was presented to the police during interrogation and the nurse also showed the court during the argument that the complainant's marriage It was on this date that the story that the complainant was told after the abduction was told that the date was derailed. The complainant's brother could not prove that the complainant was previously married to another person and had made the accused's marriage contract to file a case. The petitioner / complainant also filed a restitution of marital rights and he was trapped in his marriage with the complainant, Medico Legal Asso. The certification did not show that the complainant had not received puberty and Neither has he shown any signs of torture on his complainant's factual marriage with the accused, the first party has denied the crime, the arrest of the accused would be a bona fide request, dismissed for bail, Under the circumstances best law firms from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer