Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MAQSOOD AHMAD

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/149, 337 F (vi) / 149, 337 F (ii) / 149, 337 F (iii) / 149, 324/149 and 395 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 against the breach. Appeal took place last night in the house adjacent to the complainant's house; no one was named accused in the FI Complainant, however, the court had earlier made dishonest improvement in its statement and both A special role was assigned to the accused. Introducing a witness, the prosecution's witnesses repeated each other's material points, giving a completely different version of what was given in the FIR. Eyewitnesses didn't say a word about the identity parade, the magistrate's testimony didn't matter. Despite not disclosing the firing of the weapons recovered from the suspect, the recoveries could not proceed to the prosecution's case, which would otherwise have been violated by section 103, CR's extra-judicial confession by the crime-accused Prior to the complainant's son was not credible even after 4/2 months of the incident, which was not supported by any independent evidence Medical evidence only showed that the deceased and injured witnesses received firearm injuries. Has come up and cannot be identified by the trial court for any misinterpretation or evidence not read by the trial after the trial. The reasons given by the court for the conduct of the accused were neither misunderstood nor the arbitral appeal against the accused's conduct in the case was dismissed. list of supreme court advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer