IMTIAZ AHMAD ALIAS MUMTAZ ALIAS TAZA versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) after deliberation and consultation filed an FIR of appreciation of evidence, when the presence of four witnesses at the time of the incident was suspected, nor the natural witnesses of the incident were presented to the Investigation Officer. Nor was the defendant's version of the defendant close to convincing and truthful to prove the allegations before the trial court, and the complainant's responses during his investigation were also confirmed. Ocular testimony was not substantiated by medical evidence; there was no effect of Toca's recovery from the defendant's exclusive possession. The accused who was trusted was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
