KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus LIAQUAT ALI
Section 42 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 19 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 144 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 100 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (2) (d) Declaration for the plaintiff The lawsuit was challenged by his mother claiming to be a "haunted woman" on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation in favor of the defendant (her nephew) in relation to her entire land. Nate could not manage his land, but the defendant was managing his land and he got executed a gift document claiming to be a document for land management. With the appellate court had also dismissed the case, but the High Court declared the legal status of undisputed position of the disputed land from witnesses in the appeal. Was located in the village, where the defendant resided and the donor did not reside. The plaintiff was being supervised by the plaintiff, who obtained the same from the donor agreement. The company filed a lawsuit against the defendant after a serious attempt to settle the matter and offered a square land to withdraw the case. And that the negotiations for the settlement took place in the presence of the nominees. = All the said witnesses supported each other on all material points and they are on cross examination examination and nothing can be extracted from them. There was even a remote suggestion that the witnesses were made, saying that the plaintiff was the owner of the land there was no legal justification for rejecting such evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Khurian wala lawyer