CH. TANVEER KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Sections 497 and 403 (1) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 9/10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) guaranteed the accused to be able to attract the provisions of S: 403 (1). The debate was made a case. , CCPC because he has already been acquitted in connection with the same allegations in the previous citation, so the trial will be final on the last word because of the same evidence based on the same facts and facts. Whether or not to sue for the second time, and in the present reference, the accused is charged with possessing more property than his original shares or forcibly seizing his original owners or buying them at a lower price. And as a result, they had to make huge profits by destroying them. In the trial, it had to prove through careful and convincing evidence that the accused was not charged with spending enough money against him. The evidence was based on the allegation that such allegation depended solely on the assumption of the investigating officer who filed the challan against him, so the accused could not be detained as a punishment especially when the court was convinced that This was not the case with the content that was created before. It is sufficient to include him in the commission of the crime, unless, after further investigation, the compelling evidence is collected and put on record, the appeal for leave of appeal was referred to and allowed. Accordingly, the accused was released on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Layyah lawyer