Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

DR. REHMAT IBAD KHAN versus EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION (EOBI)


Articles 4 and 2 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 212, 185 (3) and 1991 constitutional seniority government employees disregarded the authority's order through a constitutional petition before the High Court, Instructed them to approach the service tribunal. Given the controversy over the implementation of its terms of service and conditions, considering that the service tribunal would sympathetically consider the issue of delay and benefits of Section 14 of the limitation, the accuracy Supreme Court upheld the High Court's view that All the related questions can go into them. Article 212 of the Constitution denied the service tribunal's leave to appeal, observing that if a public servant was advised, the service could seek its remedy before the tribunal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.