ASAD MUMTAZ ALI versus CH. ALI AHMAD, SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE
Displaced persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 2 (4) Settlement Scheme L, Para 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Settlement Rules for the benefit of applicants in view of additional area, non-payment of cost. I have not been paid in full for the additional area but more than three times the return area has paid the additional amount in their possession only on the memo issued in favor of the petitioner in the interest of the authorities. The revised policy was issued and stated that the memo was recovered where full payment was not made, issuance of the memo to transfer the additional area. Was simply not allowed to stand with, no illicit right was asserted in favor of the petitioner in the interest of the applicant. Depending on the fulfillment of the price payment condition that was neither implemented nor the leg of the memo, the permanent transfer agreement issued in favor of the applicant in the interest of the applicants was immediately withdrawn and withdrawn. In which the High Court refused to interfere with the sanction of the circumstances by the authorities.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer