Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN versus DADEX ENTERNIT

Orders of Companies 1984 Sections 7 (1) (2), 305 and 307 to terminate the company, to repeal the clause of the prayer and transfer it to another court, under the court to maintain such petition in Lahore. A jurisdictional request was objected to by the company. On the basis that his registered office was in Karachi, the petitioner did not deny the company's claim about the location of his registered office, but he claims that he maintained his prayer in connection with the products being sold in Punjab. While the rest of his claim will be divided and handed over to Sindh. The accuracy of the High Court The High Court, where the registered office of the company was located, could not be enjoyed under any of the jurisdictional Companies Ordinance, 1984, nor could any claim clause admit to being two such pieces and Neither the High Court can legally divide any case and send a portion of it to another court of equal jurisdiction; the Sindh High Court had returned the direction petitioner if it had been advised. File your filing before the Sindh High Court best law firms from Fateh Jang lawyer