AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY versus MIR ALAM
Sections 4 & 23 and Civil Civil Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), Sections 107, 114, 117, 151, XLI, RR 4, 33 and XLVII, R1 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), section Appeal was accepted by the landlords for an increase in the appellant's compensation to 42 and to the appellant's High Court on 4 12 2000 to add some landowners (applicants) for the grant of mandatory acquisition compensation, But the petition filed by the applicants for their inclusion was rejected. The applicants have been filed under Section 107, 114, 115, 151 under Section 107, 114, 115, 151 which read with O XLI, RR 4 & 33 and O XLVII, R 1, CPC. Is gone In favor of his adviser he entered the backs of lawyers who were unable to enter the appeal because of ignorance or through the typist, who had typed the memo of the appeal. And that they should not be prosecuted for negligence or negligence of their lawyer or that the Typist High Court accepted the application, using its inherent jurisdiction under CPC 151, and that they should be compensated Eligible applicants were found to have failed to prove such a charge. His lawyer's affidavit, which was allegedly executed by the Power of Attorney or typewriters who possibly typed the appellant's notes, cannot be denied. After the names of the survivors were removed, they were admitted to the back of the Power of Attorney. Limitation period: Appeal for applicants to appeal against the High Court order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Pasroor lawyer