Failure to prove the pre-emption co-owner of property in sections 4 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, when both the courts found the former emperor as a co-owner in the estate, in their favor The verdict could not run in the blank. As a co-owner of the case, as a co-owner of the state, he could not lose his privilege, because the appeal was dismissed as there was no false evidence of material evidence in the record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
