TARIQ ALIAS TAHRI versus THE STATE
Section 2 evidence2 The testimony of testimony testimony was recorded immediately to the FLR The suspect was designated in the FIR The incident was presented to the day's ocular account submitted by the complainant and another The eyewitness testimony was disputed by medical evidence in which there was no reason for the prosecution's witnesses to make false accusations of the accused. In this case, the situation was maintained to prevent the culprit from being found guilty when there was a minor dispute. What happened between the parties immediately before the incident was clearly slapped on the suspect's head, and it cannot be ruled out that the suspect was expected to be under provocative heat. I could shoot. There was no previous rivalry between the parties, it was alleged that they did not shoot, the accused were acquitted by denying the same witnesses, the death sentence of the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Muridkay lawyer
