Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MAQSOOD versus THE STATE

Accused 29, (b) (e), 324/334/336 / 337a (i) / 34 accused of defining evidence, nose, permanent destruction, an eye, an ear and a body face And the injuries sustained by throwing acid on the affected person were acknowledged. The limbs sustained by the victim and sustained damage to her body were not proven by the statement of the accused, the testimony of the other prosecution and the admission of the accused, but by medical evidence the offender is considered unimaginable. I did not challenge his sentence but prayed that the sentence of imprisonment under PPC, Section 6 &, and 6 33, be arbitrary with the court, be directed to walk together rather than with permanent exceptions. And Aar and Dait can be punished separately for each injury. But under Section 4 334 and 6 separate6, the separate sentence imprisonment, for each injury in the same transaction, will require inspection by the PPC for a period of ten years; The throwing act, punishable by separate imprisonment for each injury resulting from the same transaction, was not appropriate under the section 7 337R, keeping the sentence and the damages awarded by the PPC. After the accused was convicted of injury, the High Court directed that instead of sentencing six people to ten years rigorous imprisonment, the accused would be sentenced. 10-year rigorous imprisonment on only one count under Section 336, PPC advocate for immigration from Gambet lawyer