Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUNIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 426 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 45 was suspended based on the orders of the President during the recorded use of the accused in prison roll ? Under Article 45 of the Constitution, its prejudice was that only the official functionary who issued the original pardon had the power to withdraw or cancel it and, consequently, on a letter already written by the accused to the ministry of amnesty. Cannot be discarded or canceled. Internally, the Government of Pakistan has not directed the Provincial Interior Department, even otherwise, that the letter was not an order issued under any sanction of the law, but rather a directive to the provincial government to prosecute the persons convicted under the NAB Ordinance. Do not recommend. For the purpose of amnesty, etc. and in any case it cannot work to cancel the accused's pardon charge, Seid completed the bulk of his sentence ie 7 years and 8 months and now only 2 years and 4 months. The balance of the balance was to take some time before making a decision in the main application, in which the accused also suffered in different ways according to his medical history. Under the circumstances, the accused was suspended immigration advocates from Harnai lawyer