MESSRS UMAR KHAN versus CHIEF ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
The provisions of Sections 20, 30, 31 (4) and 39 (v) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, aside from objecting to the jurisdiction of the court, the arbitrator filed an award in the High Court which made it an arbitration agreement. The matter was referred to the dispute. The High Court had no jurisdiction to appoint and refer the arbitrator as the award was obtained illegally when the application was made under section 20 of the Arbitration Act in the High Court, so it was available to the appellant. Was. An apology was sought and thereafter it could not be raised in the appeal under Section 39 (IV) of the said Act, when it was found valid after the reference and the pursuit of the award, the general principle of acquittal of such object was also not sustained. Will be. With regard to the award, the order could only be filed by the court from which the High Court was the only competent court in which the award could be filed. Arms of section 31 (4) of the Act
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Mailsi lawyer