HAQUE NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) section 497 (1), third provisions [as amended by the Criminal Code (Amendment) Ordinance (LIV of 2001), section 2] the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302 / 324/109/34 The bail is alleged to have been due to a legal delay for more than two years and was not attributed to any delay in the trial. Through the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance (LIV of 2001), the defendant's request for bail is still pending before the aforesaid amendment ordinance, and he has obtained a right under the third provision accordingly. The accused was entitled to bail. This record was neither a former offender nor a dangerous criminal principal participant had already been released on bail on a legal basis and the accused, whose case was less serious, was entitled to bail on the principle of consistency. Well the accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer