ZAHEER AHMAD versus THE STATE
In the Arts 3/4 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), the definition of evidence of section 9 was fully capable of investigating the matter on the basis of the powers conferred under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997. Through investigation, no witness of the prosecution had any hostility or intimidation to falsely implicate him against the accused. Failure to provide an explanation for his presence at the airport and the large quantities of heroin recovered was evidence of the prosecution and sufficient to link the accused to the commission of the crime and accordingly the accused was convicted of the crime. According to him, the accused was a carrier and before that the offender and heroin quantity was recovered. Was less than 10 kilograms, no death sentence or life imprisonment; therefore, you are required to stop the law guaranteed and the defendant was sentenced to 14 years R1 in circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Blitang lawyer