MUHAMMAD NASEEM versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Contempt Rule (XL of 1860), Section 324/34 Guarantee, entry of notice station station diary on relevant date and time did not show the name of the accused, but The accused was named as a co-accused in the FIR filed 10 days after the incident; there was no conclusive evidence against the accused other than the complainant's version and no direct report was made in the earlier report. The role was not entrusted to him, or else in the FIR, the responsibility for the fire was attributed to the co-accused before the medical certificate accused Fah was brought into the category of ambivalence, but according to the complainant, it has taken advantage of the two conflicting views after taking advantage of it. The defendant's constructive obligation can only be determined in the trial case against the accused seeking an inquiry, he was entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Arifwala lawyer
