MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN versus THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT SIALKOT
Sections 3 and 3 of the Provincial Government High Court have observed the disposal of cases by the administration of the Justice Tribunal that if a member who belonged to the executive constituted a tribunal, it is likely that some cases involving the governor or Include orders from senior officers. Attacked, the member may not be able to act fairly and freely in a fair and practical manner, thus eliminating the concept of a fair administration of justice, for the purpose of Section 3A of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, Was able to dispose of the numbers. Cases Because if every case was heard by the Tribunal under Section 3 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, the High Court may be informed that the Tribunal's composition should be addressed to the Tribunal. Hearing of the case should be such as to encourage public confidence and ensure that the stream of justice suggests unreasonable flows, wherever the situation may be, by the tribunal governor or before a senior officer, before the tribunal chairman. Could be resolved by directing the division of the tribunal's work in such a way that Such cases consist of the Tribunal, the Interstate, the Chairman and that the Tribunal should also have an equal number of Judicial Members of the High Court Judge and after a meaningful consultation with the Chief Justice. Appointments should be made and each bench should be headed by at least one. Judicial Member so as to eliminate any misleading or confinement of the bereaved in relation to the independent work of the Tribunal High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
