The appeal against the ocular evidence did not affect the trust after the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 417 (1), and it was doubtful whether eyewitnesses had seen the incident or The incident did not take place. Ocular testimony by the prosecution was not supplemented by any conclusive evidence. One piece of fraudulent evidence could not confirm another piece of fraudulent evidence; the trial court in the trial took advantage of the suspects for reasonable and strong reasons and did not demand their fate. Was. Any interference of the High Court of Appeal against the accused's fate was excluded accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
