Find a Lawyer

STATE versus IFTIKHAR

The appeal against the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 Brett Prosecution Case, was fully exempt from the witness's sole statement, which was the mother of the victim who presented the general statement of the incident and its motives. Also mentioned about Although the single statement of a witness was sufficient to prove the accused's conviction, the sole testimony of the witness of the relevant occasion will not be relied upon unless the witness is charged. Unless such testimony is relied upon. A convincing explanation for his presence at a place where he was usually not expected to be present at a particular time has proved that the witness was not present on the spot and that he did not attend the incident. Was not heard, in the circumstances, was not properly denied that the FIR of such witness was also filed after considerable delay. It seems that after consultation and preliminary investigation. In these circumstances the authenticity of the FIR was questionable as the accused's alleged abduction was meaningless because he did not have any oral evidence The defects of D can be far off, and neither does the accused prove himself guilty of the crime. The allegation was also not supported and the motive was not satisfactorily proved that the evidence related to the recovery of the gun on the suspect's identity was highly skeptical, nor could the accusation of the accused's conduct be falsified or misleading. There was an appeal against being bad in situations. Dismiss famous supreme court advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer