Find a Lawyer

MST. ZAMURD BEGUM versus I.D.B.P.

Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance 1997 Sections 9 and 10 sued the defendant, who was one of the Managing Directors of the Company, for the suit to appear and defend against the debt collection. The bank obtained the favorable financial benefit, in favor of and through the issuance of the document, and said that the title was to protect the claimant's mortgaged properties and plant machinery, etc. Title Title The defendant filed a memorandum with the defendant. The lawsuit was not filed and applied for leave and defense on various grounds and Ink Provided that the documents affixed to them by the plaintiff bank were affixed to their signature and were laid by the plaintiff bank. The plaintiff claimed that because she was an old woman of old age, she was cheated by the second defendant and was entitled to the association of bank officials. In order to defend the case, because of a dispute over his Lady D's signatures, Fendant claimed that the trial court had a record of evidence, based on the fact that his signatures were in dispute or not. Should have resolved the issue, comparing the signatures of the defendant appearing on the lawyer, the General Power of Attorney and the appeal filed by the bank on the documents signed by the bank, etc. That they were exactly the same and that the letter of bail was to deny the defendant's signature and Without proof of work did not belong regardless of other documents. , To offer a holiday on occasion and to defend it property advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer