MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus THE STATE
Sections 302/34, 449 and 393 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), complimenting the evidence of section 7 cannot be controlled by those who complain of losing their two young brothers in their own home and thus Not surprisingly, if he did, he would not name the accused in the FIR, though he later informed the police about their names and specifically named them in the trial. The woman who lost her husband during the incident cannot be believed that he lied to save her. The eyewitnesses were the natural witnesses to the real culprit and the accused in this case for falsely implicating them. Evidence for the recovery of the ocular account was verified by medical evidence and the forensic science laboratory report and the defendant's sentence were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer
