SAHIBZADA SYED SIKANDAR SHAHEEN versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 392, 324, 337f (iii), 452, 354, 365/511, 148 and 149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) )), Sections 247 and 439 were dismissed for non-prosecution. Waldetti Complaint presented its evidence but the accused was not yet prosecuted by the court. At one date both the complainant and his lawyer were absent when the case was called, but the court had already The dismissal of the complaint was not considered appropriate and was then transferred to the Sessions Court, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by an invalid order. Legal status does not require a court to dismiss a complaint before proceeding to make it absent. Or his lawyer's complaint contained a serious version of the case in which the complainant was being tried in a special court established under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, when the complainant examined his testimony. And if he was forced to file a new complaint and re-examine the witnesses, it would not only cause him suffering but also prevent unnecessary proceedings, there was no legal compulsion of the illegal order, justice. The cause will not proceed and so it was held. Due to inadequate use of the amended jurisdiction, the impeachment order was set aside and the case was remanded to the sessions court in accordance with the law, which allowed the request for review. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kashmore lawyer